Eng 101 Expository Essay Final Paper

Laws for the profit in instructional Standards No infant odd quarter is an excellent stain that we can use to open doors for the children we repre displace (Wright, integrityyer at Law). Peter Wright is an attorney who particular(prenominal)izes in cases meet children with spare groomingal c only for. When he made this introducement, he was referring to a fair play that president George W. Bushs administration passed in 2001. No Child Left behind (NCLB) is a impartiality that requires states to assess the canonic skills for children in certain casts. This was non the first law to be created by the g everywherenment.Before NCLB was created, first on that point was dent 504 of the replacement execute, and the second was the unmarried with Disabilities cultivational Improvement be active (IDEIA) also kn experience as Public Law 94-142. Every since the first law was created in the early 1970s drills all(a) over set out complained. So schools would not fix to confront by these laws states would refuse the financing that was given to them by the presidency for pedagogics. When these laws were created, it was to protect all children with whatsoever course of special fatalitys. Before scratch 504 was created schools could pinally tucker out any child they thought may bugger off had a learning disability.Section 504 of the Rehabilitation action In 1973 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act was created to be an anti-discrimi tribe statute meant to stop discrimi kingdom against scholarly persons with special needs from judicatureal actors and to protect these disciples equal rights. For a scholar to qualify for protection under Section 504 he or she must be determined to (1) eat up a physical or mental loss that can limit integrity or to a largeer extent major life activities (2) it must be on record that the child does have an impairment or (3) the child must be looked at as possessing said impairment. every(prenominal) students who qualify under Section 504 be entit guide to a free and admit habitual fosterage also known as FAPE. If a school violated the Section 504 laws the student must signal (1) that he or she does have a disability tell in Section 504 (2) that the student does qualify for said benefit that he or she were denied (3) that the student was denied because of his or her disability, and (4) that the benefit that student was denied is obtaining money from the government to help with the program (Hoffman-Peak, 2009).The US Department of fostering (ED) is responsible for enforcing Section 504 for all schools receiving capital. Recipients of these funds include all public schools, colleges, and some other education agencies within the state. Individual with Disabilities breedingal Improvement Act In 1975 relation back created the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (Public Law 94-142). This Act stated that any school receiving federal funds is requisite to provide equa l access to education for children with any kind of disability.With the input of the childs parents public schools had to evaluate the student and create an educational throw that would be as close as attainable to that of a non-disabled student. The Act also stated that school districts must provide administrative procedures for parents so they may dispute decisions surrounding their childs education. formerly these administrative efforts had become exhausted, the parents would be allowed to seek a judicial review under Section 504. The carcass of dispute resolution created by PL 94-142 was to help with the fiscal burden created by litigation.In 1997 President Clinton and telling amended the law to Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This would be the first time since Public Law 94-142 was created in 1975 that a significant change was made speckle retaining the basic protections. The finishing was to clarify, strengthen, and provide guidance on the law. The s econd time would be in 2004 when relative would once again make amendments calling it Individual with Disabilities Educational Improvement Act (IDEIA).For 20 historic period the research showed that education can be more effective if (1) it is ensured that the child get holds general education to the maximal extent possible (2) the parents design in the childs education is stronger (3) organise efforts from the school and agencies are made to guarantee that children are benefiting from these efforts. Also that special education is a service for children not a place for them to be sent off to, and (4) all personal who work with children with special needs allow receive the proper education to teach these students.Because Public Law 94-142 was created a great deal of progress has been made toward meeting our nations goals for creating programs for individuals with special needs. Such accomplishments had included, one that a majority of children with special needs were included in regular classrooms with non-disabled children. No Child Left Behind Act Immediately after taking dominance in 2001 President George W. Bush proposed the idea for the No Child Left Behind Act. The bill passed by dint of the United Stated House of Representatives on whitethorn 23, 2001, and again on June 14, 2001 by the United States Senate. afterwards first proposing the Act close to a social class before President Bush signed the Act into law on January 8, 2002. The goal behind this law was to hold schools and states accountable for improving the education of two disabled and non-disabled students. The purpose was to identify than transform schools that have not provided an excellent education to students. These schools would be glum into successful schools. Furthermore, NCLB intentions are to close the learning fault between high up and low achievers, minority and non-minority students as well as advantaged and disadvantaged students.To accomplish this goal the reform pl anned to use a state assessment system designed to ensure all students are meeting the state academic and grade aim content. The implementation of these goals, call for a high level standard that can be thrifty for all students. There is no doubt that this Act has brought a closer look on students who ordinarily have performed on a lower level of education, causing it to be praised, while at the similar time this law has been criticized by many because inconsistencies frame within the law.Title One of the No Child Left Behind Act states a gradation called fit Yearly Progress (AYP) in which schools, districts, and states must be held accountable for the education performance of students. However, in that location are faults with the Adequate Yearly Progress one of these faults is whether or not AYP can provide an hi-fi measurement of the goals because states are allowed to make their own standards. Statistics show that there are 50 different educational measurement standards across the country.Because these states can create their own standards, they can manipulate their AYP, thus resulting in schools self-aggrandizing the impression that they are successful in commandment when they may not be. The Reauthorization of the unsophisticated and lowly Education Act In 2010 President Obama and Congress assembled a blueprint of reform called The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. This blueprint builds and re-envisions a federal role around these five priorities.It states that (1) all students despite their race, income, ethnic or language background, or disability will be college and career ready when they graduate from high school. The government will financial support all states to implement a better education through an onward motion of a professional intermitment. (2) The government will elevate the dogma profession so as to recognize excellency in teaching. All school districts must develop a system that supports teac hers. (3) Schools that have the most mendment from their students will be rewarded.This includes students graduating and those on their way to graduating by 2020. To make sure that the responsibility for improving does not fall all on the schools, states and districts will be held accountable for not providing their schools the support they need to acquire. (4) Incentives will be provided to encourage state and districts to work with schools to improve education of students. The government will support college red ink strategies to help students succeed. (5) A new competitive funding will help with flexibility, reward results, and ensure that these funds provided are used wisely.While districts will not be restricted on how they spend the funding. The government will help create new ideas that support family and the community with their childs education (The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act). Conclusion Since 1973 when Section 504 of the Rehabilitatio n Act was introduced into Congress there has been one clearly goal amongst government. This goal is for all students no outcome their background or disability are to receive an education. In the past 38 years Congress has reformed and amended all the education laws for advancement in the education system.It would no longer be acceptable for schools to fail in giving students the education they deserve. Throughout the years statics have shown that despite laws created our education system is failing and needs vast improvement in order for the next generation to succeed in the future. As stated by President Barack Obama in a letter, he wrote to be place in the introduction of The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. America was once the best educated nation in the world. A generation ago we led all nations in college completion, but today 10 countries have passed us.It is not that their students are smarter than ours. It is that these countries are crea tion smarter about how they educate their students References Author unknown (September 2010) Adequate Yearly Progress, Education Week Retrieved on whitethorn 23, 2011, from http//www. edweek. org/ew/issues/adequate-yearly-progress/ Berlatsky, N. (2011) No Child Left Behind Is a Good Law. Opposing Viewpoints School Reform. Detroit Greenhaven Press, from Powersearch. Hoffman-Peak, H. (Summer 2009) A Matrimonial Practitioners Guide to Special Education Law. American Journal of Family Law. Retrieved May 19, 2011 from, Powersearch Maleyko, G. Gawlik, M. A. (Spring 2011) No child left behind what we know and what we need to know. Education. Retrieved on May 19, 2011, from Powersearch Us Department of Education (August 2010) Free Appropriate Public Education for scholar With Disabilities. Retrieved May 23, 2011, from http//www2. ed. gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/edlite-FAPE504. html US Government, (March 2010). A Blueprint for Reform The Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. ED. gov. Retrieved on May 20, 2011, from http//www2. ed. gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/publicationtoc. html